Verified institutional identity · Egypt
Haq Legal Consultancy Institution
مؤسسة حق للاستشارات القانونية
Haq serves businesses and private clients facing legal decisions in Egypt. The website introduces the institution; accepted legal work begins only after responsibility, scope, communication and fees are confirmed in writing.
- English name
- Haq Legal Consultancy Institution
- Arabic name
- مؤسسة حق للاستشارات القانونية
- Operating context
- Legal consultancy in Egypt
- Client routes
- Businesses and private clients
The record before the conclusion
A legal answer must begin with the record beneath it.
Haq organises the first analysis around the client’s actual decision: who is involved, what gives each person authority, which documents govern, what happened in what order and what must now be decided.
- People and authority
- Who gives instructions, who may be affected and what establishes authority to act.
- Governing record
- Which agreement, company document, correspondence, policy or personal record may control the issue.
- Timing and sequence
- Which signature, payment, notice, meeting or other date may change the available route.
- Decision required
- What the client needs to understand, protect, negotiate, recover or resolve.
Verified founder record
Dr Mohamed Ali Saber
Dr Mohamed Ali Saber is identified as Co-Founder of Haq Legal Consultancy Institution. His public profile is limited to the institutional information confirmed for publication.
- Verified name
- Dr Mohamed Ali Saber
- Institutional role
- Co-Founder
- Institution
- Haq Legal Consultancy Institution
- Matter responsibility
- The lead for a particular accepted instruction is identified separately in writing.
The engagement record · before work begins
Accepted work needs a written record of responsibility.
A website visit or first conversation does not define the professional relationship. For accepted work, the engagement record should make the people, question, boundaries, communication route and commercial basis visible.
- Responsible lead
- The person responsible for directing the accepted instruction is identified to the client.
- Instruction authority
- The client contact and authority to instruct, provide records and approve decisions are made clear.
- Scope and output
- The legal question, expected work, intended output and material boundaries are recorded.
- Record and channel
- Requested documents and the route for sensitive communication are confirmed for the instruction.
- Fees and change
- The fee basis is recorded, and any material change in facts or requested work is assessed separately.
From first context to accepted work
An enquiry opens a review. Written acceptance opens the engagement.
Share only enough context for Haq to identify the legal area, the people involved, the decision needed and any important date.
Do not send sensitive evidence at this stage. Wait until Haq confirms a suitable channel for the matter.
- First facts
- Describe the parties, the change or concern, the required outcome and the nearest important date.
- Initial review
- Haq considers how the request should be routed and whether further context is needed.
- Written confirmation
- If the work can proceed, the lead, scope, communication route and fee basis are confirmed separately.
- Accepted instruction
- Only then should instructions and records move through the route confirmed for the matter.